THE UEI-PDP: A MODEL FOR ENSURING QUALITY IN TEACHER AND HEAD TEACHER DEVELOPMENT

Main Article Content

Fatima Ayesha Khan
Bilal Hassan Shah
Sara Nabila Raza

Abstract

This paper presents the design of a Monitoring Process for the Professional Development Program (PDP) for Primary School Teachers (PSTs) in Sindh, launched by the United Educational Initiative (UEI) in collaboration with five governmental and non-governmental organizations under the Education Sector Reform Assistance (ESRA). The PDP aims to enhance the learning environment through ongoing professional development of teachers and administrators. Implementation occurs in four districts of Sindh, facilitated by a dedicated team of professionals. Recognizing the significance of capacity building, 130 Master Trainers were selected to train 17,000 teachers and 3,000 head teachers/administrators over two years. The monitoring process utilizes various data collection methods, including pre/post-observations, interviews, questionnaires, and reports, allowing monitoring teams to assess program progress and implement corrective actions as needed. The evaluation framework employs both formative and summative techniques, with formative evaluations guiding immediate improvements and summative evaluations categorizing schools based on training effectiveness. This categorization is intended to identify schools requiring further enhancement and to stimulate research into the factors contributing to the varied success levels of schools. The findings aim to improve the educational system in Sindh by fostering a culture of continuous learning among educators.

Article Details

Cite This Paper
Fatima , A. K., Bilal , H. S., & Sara , N. R. (2024). THE UEI-PDP: A MODEL FOR ENSURING QUALITY IN TEACHER AND HEAD TEACHER DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of Current Educational Practice, 12(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12732137

References

1. Academics concerned at poor state of education (2005, December 30). Dawn, p. 19.

2. Academy for Educational Development (2005). Improving teaching practices in Pakistan.

3. Published conference proceedings. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from

4. http://www.aed.org/Education/International/Teaching-Practices-inPakistan.cfm

5. Ali MA (1998). Supervision for teacher development: an alternative model for Pakistan. Int. J. Edu.

6. Dev. 20(3), 177-188. Arcaro J (1995). Creating quality in the classroom. London. Kogan Page

7. Ltd.

8. Bregman J, Mohammad N (1998). Primary and secondary education structural issues. In Hoodbhoy,

9. P. (Ed), Education and the state: fifty years of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

10. Calderhead J (2001). International experiences of teaching reform. In V.

11. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Washington: American Research Association. pp.

12. -802.

13. Darling-Hammond L (2001). Standard setting in teaching: Changes in licensing, certification and

14. assessment. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Washington: American

15. Research Association. pp. 751-776.

16. Del Cotto-Kaminski L (n.d.). Leadership, change and organizational learning Canadian CEO's

17. Perspective. Retrieved Dec 28, 2005 from

18. http://www.vink.helsinki.fi/files/Theoria_leadership.html

19. Farah I (1996). Roads to success: self-sustaining primary school change in rural Pakistan. Washington

20. DC: World Bank.

21. Fullan M (1998). Change forces: probing the depths of educational reform. London: The Falmer Press.

22. Fullan M (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: JoseyBass. Gap widens in male, female

23. literacy rate: Pakistan Education and School Atlas. (2003, June11). Dawn, Retrieved Jan 6,

24. , from http://lists.isb.sdnpk.org/pipermail/gsdlist/2003June/001127.html.

25. Hashim F (1999). An investigation of factors affecting teachers’ use of a variety of teaching methods in

26. the classroom. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

27. Hayes D (2003). A student teacher’s guide to primary school placement: learning to survive and

28. prosper. London: Routledge Falmer. Hoodbhoy P (Ed.) (1998). Education and the state: Fifty

29. years of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University.

30. Hoodbhoy P (2004). Pakistan’s education system its greatest threat.

31. Pakistan Facts. Retrieved Jan 10, 2006, from http://www.Pakistanfacts.com/article.php/20041017195851719 Hussain MA (2005). Development in educational

32. practices. UNESCO. Retrieved Jan 12, 2006, from

33. http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/file_download.php

34. Jalal Z (2003). A change in attitudes about education in Pakistan. Education Today newsletter. JulySeptember 2003, UNESCO

35. Jalalzai MK (2005). The crisis of education in Pakistan: state education and the text-books. Lahore: AlAbbas international.

36. Kazilibash HH (1998). Teaching teachers to teach. In Hoodbhoy, P. (Ed), Education and the state: fifty

37. years of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press

38. Kent AM (2005). Acknowledging the need facing teacher preparation programs responding to make a

39. difference. Education, 125(3), 343348.

40. Khan T (2003, Feb. 9). Scratching beneath the surface. Dawn, p. 20. Malik SR (1992). The system of

41. education in Pakistan. National Book Foundation, Islamabad.

42. Martin M (2005). Reflections in teacher education: How can it be supported? Edu. Action Res. 13(4),

43. -541.

44. Memon M (1998). The future of head teachers as educational leaders in Pakistan: Implications for

45. pedagogical leadership. Education 2000, 3(3), 17-21.

46. Minhas S (2003, Feb. 16). Banish the teacher blues. Dawn, p. 23.

47. Mohammed, RF (2004). Practical constraints upon teacher development in Pakistani schools. J. Inservice Edu., 30(1), 101-114.

48. Ministry of Education Pakistan (2000). National Education Policy 19982010, Retrieved Jan 8, 2006,

49. from http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/education-ministry/highlights/highlight-three1.jsp

50. Ministry of Education (2002). Facts and figures Pakistan: Education for all wing. UNICEF. Islamabad.

51. Ministry of Education Pakistan (2003). Education Sector Reforms: Action Plan 2001-2005. Islamabad.

52. Ministry of Education Pakistan (2003). National Plan of Action on Education For All (2001-2015):

53. Islamabad.

54. O'Sullivan M (2002). Effective follow-up strategies for professional development for primary teachers

55. in Namibia. Teacher Development, 6(2), 181-203.

56. O'Sullivan M (2005). What is happening in the classroom? A common-sense approach to improving

57. the quality of primary education in developing countries. Teacher Development, 9(3), 301-314.

58. Patton MQ (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

59. Quddus NJ (1990). Problems of education in Pakistan. Karachi: Royal Book Company.

60. Rampal A (2000). Education for human development in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly.

61. July 22. p. 2523-2531.

62. Ranis G, Stewart F (n.d.) (2000). Strategies for success in human development. Retrieved on 9th

63. January from http://hdr.undp.org/docs/training/oxford/readings/Ranis%20and%20-

64. Stewart.pdf

65. Rarieya JFA (2005). Reflective dialogue: what’s in it for teachers? A Pakistani case. J. In-service Edu.

66. (2), 313-335.

67. Rizvi M (1999). A study of attitudes towards teacher effectiveness amongst selected educators in

68. Karachi, Pakistan. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh,

69. Pakistan.

70. Rossi P, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE (2004). Evaluation: a systematic approach (7th ed.). London: Sage

71. Publications.

72. Saleem M (1999). Education for all: the year 2000 assessment. Pakistan Country Report. Government

73. of Pakistan, Ministry of Education, Islamabad.

74. Shah D (2003). Decentralization in the Education System of Pakistan: Policies and Strategies. Academy

75. of Educational Planning and Management Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan,

76. Islamabad.

77. Siddiqui S (2003, March 18). Why teachers don’t change. Dawn, p. 23.

78. Simkins T, Sisum C, Memon M (2003). School leadership in Pakistan: exploring the head teacher’s role.

79. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 275-291.

80. Simkins T, Garrett V, Memon M, NazirAli R (1998). The perception of government and nongovernment head teachers in Pakistan.

81. Educational Management and Administration, 26(2), 131-146 managers and researcher. Washington:

82. World Bank.

83. Valadez J, Bamberger M (1997). Monitoring and evaluating social Winch C (1996). Quality and

84. education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

85. programs in developing countries: a handbook for policy

86. makers