Effects of Peer Assessment Technique on Students’ Academic Achievement and Interest in Mensuration in Upper Basic Schools in Enugu North Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria

Main Article Content

Ogbodo, Ifeyinwa Adani
PROF. (MRS.) Uche Agwagah
DR. Eric Ozomadu

Abstract

The study examined effects of peer-assessment technique on students’ academic achievement and interest in Mathematics in Upper Basic Schools II in Enugu North Local Government Area of Enugu State. The study adopted a Quasi Experimental Research Design and used the pretest – posttest non-randomized control group design. The area covered by this study is Enugu Education Zone of Enugu State. This education zone consists of Enugu East, Enugu North and Isi-uzo Local Government Areas of Enugu State. The population of the study consisted of all the Upper Basic School Two (UBSII) students in Enugu North Local Government Area of Enugu State numbering 5,628 (male = 2,492 and female =3,136). A sample of 120 Upper Basic School II (UBSII) students (58 males and 62 females) was used for the study. The researcher used a multi-stage sampling technique to draw the sample for the study. Two research questions and two null hypotheses guided the study. Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT) and Mathematics Interest Scale (MIS) were used to collect data for the study. The data was analyzed using mean, standard deviation and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The result revealed that peer assessment, which is a method of assessment whereby learners are allowed to assess their peers and give feedback based on a given rule had significant effect on students’ academic achievements and interest in mathematics. The study also revealed that peer assessment method is significant in enhancing students’ academic achievement in mathematics. The study further indicated that peer assessment in enhancing male and female students’ interest in mathematics does not differ significantly. Based on the findings of this study, it could be concluded that when Peer Assessment is properly used by teachers, the academic performance and achievement of the students will not only improve but it can also enable the students to better understand and develop keen interest in the contents of the subject. Proper understanding and interest in the contents of the subject will enable the students not only to perform better but enhance academic achievement. The study recommended that peer assessment strategy should be used by teachers in the teaching and assessment of student in mathematics

Article Details

Cite This Paper
Ogbodo, I. A., Agwagah, U., & Ozomadu , E. (2024). Effects of Peer Assessment Technique on Students’ Academic Achievement and Interest in Mensuration in Upper Basic Schools in Enugu North Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria. International Journal of Current Educational Practice, 12(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14267376

References

1. AbdulRahman, A. A. (2014). Emotional intelligence and academic achievement: A comparative,

2. gender-based study of undergraduate English language learners in Saudi Arabia. Journal of education and practice, 5 (6), 178-190

3. Adigwe, J. C. (2015). Emotional intelligence and problem-solving achievement of chemistry

4. students. ATBU, Journal of Science, Technology & Education (JOSTE). 3(1), 80-95.

5. Adeyemi E.O. (2012). Students, Peers and Teachers’ Strategies as a Measure of Effective Classroom Assessment and the Value of Triangulation. A Paper Presented at the University of West Cape at the International Conference on Research and Capacity Building, March, 2012.

6. Akiri, K.B. & Nkechi, A. (2019) Teacher-student interactions in a ubiquitous Computing

7. environment learning within dyads & triads of interactions, Journal of the Research Centre for Educational Technology, 1(1): 306—410.

8. Ali, A. N. & Kalu, I. (2011) Classroom Interaction patterns: Teacher and student Characteristics

9. and students’ learning outcomes in physics, International Journal of Educational Research, .5: 6-13.

10. Andrade, O.A (2017) The level of Achievement on Mathematical Concepts Among Nigerian

11. Final-year Secondary School Students, Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 32 -58

12. Atanda, A.I. & Jaiyeoba, A.O. (2018), School Quality Factors and Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Mathematics in South-Western and North-Central Nigeria. The African Symposium, 11(1), 111-123.

13. Ashkanasy, N. M., (2018). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational

14. behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 441–452.

15. Asuai, A.C. (2013) A look at the Teacher Education approaches, Zaria Journal of Educational

16. Studies, 5(1 &2): 21-32

17. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., and Mylonas, A., (2012). “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using and Action Research Process”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441.

18. Balogun, T.A (2015) Interest in Science and Technology Education in Nigeria, Journal of the

19. Science Teachers ‘Association, Nigeria 23(2): 92-99

20. Biehler, R.F. and Snowman, J. (2017). Psychology Applied to Teaching (5th Ed.) Boston;

21. Houghton Mifflin Company.

22. Bhatia, H.R. (2013) A Textbook of Educational Psychology, New Delhi: Rajiv-Ben

23. Publishers, Ltd.

24. Chandramohan, B. and Fallows, S. (2018). Multiple Approaches to Assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment, Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246, 2001.

25. Cowan, J. (2015) In: Designing assessment to enhance student learning. Routhledge, New York. ISBN-0-415-30821-6. Peer-Assessment. Cornell University: Center for Teaching Excellence.

26. Davies M. & Hersh, Y. (2012). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. Routhledge, New York. ISBN-0-415-30821-6. Peer-Assessment. Cornell University: Center for Teaching Excellence.

27. Dandekar, W.N. & Makhiji, S.M. (2013). Psychological Foundations of Education, New Delhi:

28. Rajir-Beri Publishers Ltd.

29. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in

30. self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208.

31. Eke, A. I. (2016) Effects of interaction of Teaching Methods and Study Habit is on Students’

32. Achievement and Interest in Chemistry, Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka,

33. Ekeh, P. U. (2013), Gender bias and achievement in science and mathematics among school

34. pupils. Implication for human resource development. Journal of Curriculum Organization of Nigeria. 10(1), 30-33

35. Essuman, J.K. (2016) The Nsukka Interest Profile: Development of a Vocational Interest

36. Inventory for Post-Primary School Students, Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

37. Ezeudu, F. O & Obi T. N. (2013). Effect of gender and location on students’ achievement in

38. chemistry in secondary schools in Nsukka local government area of Enugu State, Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social

39. Ezendu, J.W. (2015). Causes of Poor Achievement in WAEC Mathematics Examination in Rivers

40. State Secondary Schools, Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 21:3

41. Fani-shing, W., Ying-Ming, L., Ching-Yua, J., & Chia-An, J. (2017). Emotional

42. intelligence and scholastic achievement in pre-adolescent children: Personality and Individual Differences. Elsevier Ltd.

43. Falchikov, N. (2015). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. Routhledge, New York. ISBN-0-415-30821-6. Peer-Assessment. Cornell University: Center for Teaching Excellence.

44. Festus, A. B. (2019). The relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement

45. of senior secondary school students in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Journal of Education and Practice. 3 (10), 13-19.

46. Furnham B.K. (2014). Discourse patterns and Collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and

47. teacher-guided discussions, Cognition and Instruction 17(4): 379-432.

48. Gambari, J.F. (2014) Tasks and Communicating in Language Classrooms, New York: McGraw-

49. Hill publishers, Ltd.

50. Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2014). Assessment for effective teaching: Using context-adaptive planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A&B.

51. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2011). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70.

52. Hornby (2016) Advanced Learners Dictionary of Mathematics.

53. Jean, P. (1978). The Piaget Constructivist’s theory of learning (PCL). Psicothema, 18, 13-25.

54. Johnson D.W. (2015) Positive Interdependence key to effective Cooperation in Hertz-

55. Lazarowitz, R and Miller, N (eds.) Interaction in Cooperative Groups: the Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

56. Joy, M. (2011), Impact of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(17), 245-261.

57. Juwah L.M (2013). Student Peer Assessment. Assessment Toolkit Teaching @UNSW retrieved 17-04-15 from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/peer-assessment

58. Juwah L.M (2016). Student Peer Assessment. Assessment Toolkit Teaching @UNSW retrieved 10-11-16 from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/peer-assessment

59. Lin, S.S.J., Liu, E.Z.F., and Yuan, S.M. (2011). Web-based Peer Assessment: Feedback for Students with Various Thinking Styles, Journal of Mathematics Assisted Learning, 17 (4), 420–432.

60. Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2015). Classroom assessment minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18-24.

61. Lepper, A., Corpus, E. & Iyengar H. (2013) Cognitive and Affective Causes of interest and

62. liking, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2): 120-130.

63. Liu, C.C., Liu, B.J., Hui, T.A., and Horng, J.T. (2012). Web Based Peer Assessment Using Knowledge Acquisition Techniques: Tools for Supporting Contexture Awareness, International Conference on Mathematics in Education, New Zealand.

64. Lubienski, C. (2019). Mathematics education and the politics of learning. Routledge

65. Lutze-Mann (2014). Student Peer Assessment. Assessment Toolkit Teaching @UNSW retrieved 17-04-21 from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/peer-assessment

66. May, G..L., and Gueldenzoph, L.E. (2016). The Effect of Social Style on Peer Evaluation Ratings in Project Teams, Journal of Business Communication, 43, 2006, pp. 4-20.

67. Meisels, S., Atkind-Burnett, S., Xue, Y., and Bickel, D. D. (2013). “Creating a System of Accountability: The Impact of Instructional Assessment on Elementary Children’s Achievement Scores”. Educational Policy Analysis Archives. 11(9).

68. Mitchner, C.A. (2013) A Comparison of the Effects of Individual and Cooperative Learning

69. Methods on Students’ Cloze Performance. Journal of World Council for Curriculum and Instruction (W C. C.I.) Nigeria chapter forum 2, (5): 25—35.

70. Nasir, M. & Masrur, R. (2015). An exploration of emotional intelligence of the students of IIUI

71. in relation to gender, age and academic achievement. Bulletin of Education and Research. 32(1): 37-51

72. Njoku . Z. C. (2013). Development and Preliminary Validation of a Scale for the Assessment of

73. Students’ Interest in O’ Level Practical Chemistry, Journal of the Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 38(1 & 2): 64-70

74. Nnamani, S. C. & Oyibe, O. A. (2016). Gender and Academic Achievement of Secondary

75. School Students in Social Studies in Abakaliki Urban of Ebonyi State. British Journal of Education. 4(8): 72-83.

76. Nworgu, B. G. (2016). Averting Pedagogical Failure in Science: Insight from Educational Measurement and Evaluation. 103rd Inaugural Lecture of the University of Nigeria. Nsukka-Enugu, University of Nigeria.

77. Nwadinigwe, H. & Azuka-Obieke G. (2018) Improved practical approaches to Mathematics

78. Teaching for sustainable Development in Nigeria, proceeding of the 50th Anniversary

79. Conference of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, HEBN Publishers PLC.

80. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to Actions. Ensuring Mathematics success for all. NCTM.

81. Obi, M. (2015) “The role of Classroom Assessment in Student Performance on TIMSS”. Applied Measurement in Education. 17(1), 1-24.

82. Obi, M. (2016), Impact of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement of Secondary School

83. Students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(17), 212-231.

84. Ogundokun, M. O. & Adeyemo, D. A. (2019). Emotional intelligence and academic

85. achievement: the moderating influence of age, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The African Symposium: An online journal of the African Educational Research network. 10(2), 127-141.

86. Oluwatomi, A.M. & Moyosore B.S. (2014) Increasing Girls’ Interest, Participation and

87. Achievement in Science, Proceeding of 42nd Annual Conference of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, Heinemann Educational Books (Nig.) plc

88. Orsmond, D.R. (2015). Interpretations of Criteria-based Assessment and Grading in Higher

89. Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175-194

90. Orsmond, P. (2011). Peer assessment in mathematics. A review of the literature. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 14(2), 147-164.

91. Ozomadu, E.A. (2020) Effects of two modes of computer. Assisted Instruction in teaching geometry in S S 2 in Enugu state. Unpublished thesis, Enugu State University of Science and Technology.

92. Perez-Bergquist E. S (2012). The Relationships between Mathematical Academic Achievement

93. and the Independent Functioning, Emotion Regulation, and Decision-Making Components of Developmental Immaturity among Adolescents in Residential Juvenile Justice Facilities. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University. Philadelphia, USA

94. Phillips, M. D., Lowe, M. J., Lurito, J. T. Dzemidzic, M., & Mathews, V. P. (2011). Temporal

95. lobe activation demonstrates sex-based differences during passive listening. Radiology. 220, 202-207.

96. Race, P. and Smith, B. (2015) 500 Tips on assessment: 2nd edition, London: Routledge.

97. Race W. (2011). Chicogo Public Schools and Student Achievement. Urban Education,

98. (1), 27-38.

99. Reading (2014). Factors Affecting Students’ Quality of Academic Performance: A Case of Secondary School Level. Journal of Quality and Technology Management. 5(2), 01-14.

100. Rodriguez, M. C. (2014). “The role of Classroom Assessment in Student Performance on TIMSS”. Applied Measurement in Education. 17(1), 1-24.

101. Sa’ad, T. U. & Usman, R. (2014). The causes of poor performance in English language among senior secondary school students in Dutse Metropolis of Jigawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Research & Method in Education. 4 (7), 72-83

102. Sadler, Philip M. and Eddie Good (2016). “The Impact of Self-and Peer-Grading on Student Learning”. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.

103. Segers, M., and Dochy, F., (2011) “New Assessment Forms in Problem-based Learning: the value-added of the students’ perspective”, Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327-343

104. Sivan, A. (2017). The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach.

105. Assessment in Education, 7, 193-213. Retrieved 7-4-2015 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713613328

106. Shaibu, A.A.M. & Usman, J.A.(2012) Effects of NISTEP mode of Teaching on Students’

107. academic achievement in Integrated Science among Junior Secondary School Students, Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 37(1 &2): 10-15.

108. Shettima, A. G (2016). Gender issues in monitoring the environment: The case of rural Nigeria.

109. A paper presented at the 39th Annual Conference of NGA held at the University of Maiduguri, May, 5-6th.

110. Stafford, A. (2013). The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education, 7, 193-213. Retrieved 7-4-2015 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713613328

111. Stiggins, R. J. (2011). Student-involved classroom assessment. 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River,

112. NJ, Merill-Prentice Hall, 2011.

113. Sullivan, P. (2019). Mathematics education and the politics of learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 14(2), 165 – 184.

114. Sweeney, I. M. (2013). Women’s intellect: The potential of women. New York: McGraw Hill

115. Tillewa, H . H. (2019). Assessment for learning. A conceptual framework for the analysis of

116. students’ assessment. Studies In Education Evaluation, 35(2) 137 – 145.

117. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2017). Formative peer assessment of

118. Academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 146-169.

119. Udeani, U.N. (2017). Learning outcomes in integrated science as related to Teacher and Student

120. characteristics and classroom interaction pattern Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

121. Ugwuanyi, C. C. (2017). Effect of Algebra substitution and factorization (ASFAC) Games on

122. S.S students’ achievement and retention in Algebra. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis, University of Nigeria Nsukka.

123. Umoh, C. G. (2013). A theoretical analysis of the effects of gender and family education on

124. human resource development. Journal of Curriculum Organization of Nigeria, 10(1), 1-4.

125. Uzoegwu, P. C. (2015). Challenges of teaching and learning mensuration in upper basic schools

126. in Enugu State Nigeria. Journal of education and practice 6 (10), 1-9.

127. Van den Bing, M, (2015). Peer assessment in mathematics education: A systematic review.

128. Educational Research Review. 14(1), 1-15.

129. WAEC Chief Examiner’s Report (2021): www.examiners.waecnigeria.org.